Operation Maker’s Mark: The Results Are In
BY VICTOR FIORILLO
A couple of months ago, I reported my suspicions that Oscar’s, a popular hole-in-the-wall bar at 1524 Sansom Street, was serving cheap bourbon to customers who ordered Maker’s Mark. I filed a formal complaint with the State Police’s Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement, whose Officer Tara Amato paid a visit to Oscar’s, confiscating six bottles of liquor. Many of the bar’s devoted patrons and one employee attacked on our comments page, accusing me of “bad journalism” and, worst of all, of being a “bourbon fraud.”
This morning, Officer Amato informed me that the state’s crime lab (yes, the same one that analyzes DNA evidence and fibers from murder scenes — probably a good indicator of why it took two months to process the seized liquor) has concluded that the Maker’s Mark she took from Oscar’s in late July is, in fact, not the genuine article. As she stated:
“Results of the analysis of item 1.1 (Maker’s Mark Whiskey) do not agree with the results of the analysis of the authentic sample (item 2.1) of Maker’s Mark Whiskey. Item 1.1 was determined to be contaminated.”
And, as a special bonus, Amato indicated that the bottle of Ketel One vodka was also not Ketel One. The remaining bottles taken from the bar that day were “determined to be true samples.” The results do not specify how the contamination occurred — did Oscar’s water down the booze? substitute rotgut for the real thing? — but clearly something is amiss. Oscar’s did not immediately return a call for comment this afternoon.
According to Amato, her office’s legal department will now determine whether to issue a citation, after which a fine, suspension, or other penalty could be imposed. Whether or not to issue a citation? Though it might come as a surprise to you, I used to be a fan of Oscar’s. Good crowd. Generally friendly staff. And 23-ounce draft beers for $3.25. But in light of these crime lab results, yeah, I think they’d better go ahead and issue that citation.
October 26th, 2009 at 5:44 pm
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by PhillyRestaurantClub and Colin Weir, PhiladelphiaMagazine. PhiladelphiaMagazine said: Lab report: Oscar's fake Maker's Mark http://bit.ly/6ZiiB [...]
October 26th, 2009 at 5:57 pm
HAHA Bobby Drinks is a huge wrong asshole. I’m so glad he got to eat his words. Douchebag.
Congrats Victor. Good looking out for those getting ripped off at an otherwise good establishment.
October 26th, 2009 at 6:08 pm
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by phillymag: Lab report: Oscar’s fake Maker’s Mark http://bit.ly/6ZiiB…
October 26th, 2009 at 10:14 pm
I love my whiskey & bourbon so I have to say “Bad Oscar’s!” while shaking my finger. Hate to hear that an old school spot like this would be putting the screws to those of us who have faithfully kept them open all these years. I may have to reconsider…
October 27th, 2009 at 10:21 am
[...] UPDATE, 10/26: The results are in — see our latest post. [...]
October 27th, 2009 at 11:10 am
So where’s “BobbyDrinks” and the other apologists now?
October 27th, 2009 at 11:11 am
Bobby Drinks was so very anxious for the results to come in – someone go wake him up and tell him it’s time for the BIG REVEAL.
If life were fair, he’d lick your boots, Victor. But I’m sure Bobby Drinks will figure out a way that he’s still right, even though he was dead wrong.
Ooooo I’m all a-tingle with schadenfreude!
October 27th, 2009 at 5:09 pm
I don’t believe it. It simply says it was contaminated. It could have had a fruit fly in it, and be contaminated. If Oscar’s is guilty why decide or not to issue. It would just be issued. I would never stop going to Oscar’s. I think i’ll go there right now. I’ll be the guy sipping a Maker’s Mark.
October 27th, 2009 at 5:28 pm
completely believe this.
got in drunken argument with bartender because their scotch tasted watered down and i feel i would know.
vindication.
October 27th, 2009 at 5:28 pm
completely believe this.
got in drunken argument with bartender because their scotch tasted watered down and i feel i would know: http://whiskytastings.blogspot.com/.
vindication.
October 27th, 2009 at 5:44 pm
to add, in fairness to the bar; the bartender was very nice and though she denied my accusation (i now feel justified in saying she was incorrect, though probably unaware), she gave us a free drink (albeit of the same watered down scotch.
October 27th, 2009 at 7:31 pm
Makers has such a distinct taste, why would a bar be dumb enough to try substituting it? A big thank you to Victor for calling them out, that’s insulting to bourbon drinkers.
October 28th, 2009 at 10:31 am
Bobby Drinks: Chastened, not stirred.
October 28th, 2009 at 11:12 am
sucks to hear this… but It isn’t surprising, considering Oscar’s has never been a place to follow the rules. Which is one of the reasons why people enjoy it. But I usually stick to beer when I am drinking at Oscar’s.
October 28th, 2009 at 1:31 pm
[...] PA crime lab results are in on the faux-Maker’s at Oscar’s scandal. Victor Fiorillo, who reported on his personal experience with what he suspected to be impostor [...]
October 28th, 2009 at 2:44 pm
[...] Fiorillo’s Operation Maker’s Mark has wrapped up and Oscar’s got busted. the divey Center City bar was serving up something [...]
October 28th, 2009 at 3:11 pm
I’m a Oscar’s regular. Sucks if you like Maker’s Mark. But who would order that expensive stuff anyway at a dive bar? lol. Who Cares. I don’t drink the stuff anyway. I’m a Vodka and Cranberry man! I’ll be at Oscar’s Friday!
October 28th, 2009 at 3:31 pm
“If Oscar’s is guilty why decide or not to issue. It would just be issued.”
Bobby, it’s pretty simple. This is wrongdoing, it’s been exposed. The bar’s been called on it. Now the PLCB is deciding it’s next move. The “whether to cite” is similar to where a motorist is issued a citation or let off with a warning. Oscar’s has been publicly shamed, rhetorically pulled over, now the PLCB should decide whether it’s the public and state’s best interest to leave it at that or whether they find the offense worthy of additional action.
Good job, Victor.
October 28th, 2009 at 3:32 pm
I have to see its almost comical that Philly Mag, a periodicial that couldn’t be any more out of touch with the Philly crowd that goes to Oscars, went to such great lengths to “prove” this….
A couple things.
1. A center city bar charging next to nothing for Makers Mark. No sh*t Sherlock. What’s next, proof that fast food soda’s are all ice?
2. The idea that you were going to Oscars for Maker’s Mark is patently ridiculous anyway. Along the same lines as your article on how to save money that suggested we share stable space for our horses. Hahahah
Ultimately, Oscars is more about the crazy divey atomosphere and the cheap drinks. Its a rule breaking place where you take a leak in the sink. This is its charm and its downfall. Different strokes for different folks. As diverse as the crowd is, I’d prefer it if the Philly Mag elite stayed away. Have fun at Rouge.
October 28th, 2009 at 3:43 pm
Oh sweet jesus son of mary and joseph! You people who say, “it’s a dive bar, what do you expect?” gotta wake up! This is not a sweet old uncle claiming his shitty acme steaks are kobe beef. This is a bar that’s ripping off everybody. It’s stealing from it’s customers (aw! how cute!) and it’s stealing from Maker’s Mark – an American Company (one of the few left to us these days). There’s nothing charming about it.
What if you found out your pharmacy was giving you delightfully adorable fake medicine?
Holy moly, you’re a bunch of stupid, enabling idiots.
October 28th, 2009 at 3:50 pm
@ Colin
I’m glad to finally find out that only rich people deserve to be served what they pay for. I didn’t realize the poors wanted good value too. Next time a working man wants a decent bourbon, let’s just kick him in the nuts!
Thanks for clearing it all up for me, Colin!
October 28th, 2009 at 8:26 pm
Keep up the good work. I’m sure there are more bars like Oscar out there. Let’s put all of them out of business for selling fake shit. Thanks Victor.
October 28th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
What goofball thinks Maker’s Mark is top shelf? That’s like saying Crown Royal is top shelf! Hahaha!!!!
The point here is that there are people walking out of other local bars because they think they’re getting the same booz for LESS MONEY at Oscar’s, which they aren’t. It’s not fair to the other bars.
And don’t act like I’m a snob for ordering Maker’s. Obviously people (besides me) are doing exactly that or Oscar’s wouldn’t have it on the shelf.
October 29th, 2009 at 8:51 am
The PLCB should fine Oscars. They ripped people off and by giving them something different than what they paid for.
To Bobby Drinks, are you seriously that deusional saying that a fruit fly contaminated the MM? It’s not like the bottles are left open for anything (dust, bugs, etc.) can get in there. You are the typical dump American. You know you are wrong and won’t admit it. Smart Americans relize they have made a mistake, own up to it, and learn from it. Clearly you are not the latter. Also can I sell you a brand new Ford F150 for $5,000? I just won’t tell you that the motor has been switched out for a hamster wheel. But you shouldn’t mind about that.
October 29th, 2009 at 2:21 pm
To vic’s buddy above, I was there tuesday and there is a pourer with a HOLE in the botttle, and all bottles. The PLCB could issue a citation, which Oscar’s could appeal. That’s how it works. This is not a “conviction” and victor has no proof that Oscar’s did anything wrong as he doesn’t know what the contamination is. This is a weird vendetta of some type, I mean the guy spent 3 months on this now? Get a life.
October 29th, 2009 at 3:09 pm
Having been a bartender in some famous Philly dives, (and some of the classier joints) I have some insight that may shock you. If we (the barstaff) think you are an asshole, we will find a way to cheat you. Yes, you will get a well whiskey and coke from me if you tip me change, and I will charge you for a Maker’s and coke. Makers should not be mixed with coke anyway. I am not excusing what Oscars did. And trust me, they did it.
All I’m saying is that this shit happens in WAY more bars than you think. Especially the classy looking ones. My point is this: Don’t act like a tool in the bar and we won’t try and fuck you over. Really, just tip us and be nice. You will get a proper drink from the bottle that ain’t watered down every time.
October 29th, 2009 at 6:32 pm
Although management is ultimately responsible for the mess, did it ever occur to anyone that a staff member could be doing the switch ups on the bottles? It would be an easy way for them to rip off their employer and customer. Bottom line: the money from the scam might be going into a bartender’s pocket, not Oscar’s cash registers. Just a thought.
October 30th, 2009 at 7:05 pm
@Petrie: I don’t see the distinction. At the end of the day, an establishment is responsible for its business, and its employees are definitely part of its business. If their employees are stealing from them and making them look bad, they have a responsibility to either correct the problem or pay the consequences. If you’re right, then they didn’t correct the problem, and a fine or other PLCB punishment is proper.
November 2nd, 2009 at 1:10 pm
This whole slew of comments just proves to me that people MAKE UP their own set of ethics to suit their own horrible personal agendas. You think someone doesn’t tip enough so you become a THIEF to pay them back. So they’re cheap, but you’re a thief. Which is worse??? And Bobby Drinks saying “contamination” could be a fruit fly! God! you’re so very very stupid, BD! It’s a scientific report – they use scientific language. What they’re saying is that the test profile doesn’t match the control (Maker’s Mark) profile. A fruit fly suspended in the alcohol wouldn’t change the profile. Do you think the crime lab is full of idiots??
November 3rd, 2009 at 2:45 pm
Was brought in to audit a hotel bar acquired thru an acquisition to ascertain why the certified numbers were off post sale. It took 3 days, and a comparision of pictures to observe that the staff had placed another register on the bar and were pocketing everytihng going into that register. Anything is possible….
November 11th, 2009 at 1:37 am
[...] Philly Mag walk into a bar? (Ah, it’s almost too easy.) The Sixth Annual [...]