An angry electorate is shaking things up across the country. Fed up with an ever growing government that cannot control its own spending, voters are ignoring the endorsements of political leaders, pundits and parties and choosing candidates who promise to change business as usual in Washington.
I can think of no better candidate in this political climate than my wife Dawn Stensland Mendte.
She believes in public service in its truest form, not as a guise to serve one’s self. She cares deeply about education, children, women and family issues and wears her beliefs on her sleeve for all to see. Those who have had the pleasure to hear Dawn speak know she is captivating in her passion and compassion. And most importantly, in this political climate, she is strident in her belief in a smaller government, a balanced budget and spending controls. These beliefs are not part of a political strategy, but part of her very being.
Dawn Stensland Mendte is the perfect candidate in 2010. That is why it is a shame she is not running.
Dawn has promised interviews to others about her decision and she will speak for herself in other forums. But she has allowed me to break the news here knowing that I am her biggest fan and supporter. So do not expect even an ounce of objectivity. But I can give you a unique perspective on what has been going on the last few months as Dawn was confronted with both the best and worst of the political process. It is something I will write about in depth another time, but for now this is about Dawn and her decision.
My wife was serious about running for Congress in Pennsylvania’s 7th District, which is made up by most of Delaware County and a portion of Montgomery and Chester Counties.
Dawn would have won. Of that, we are confident.
I know that from veteran political advisors who came to our home and ran through the numbers. I know that from office holders from both parties who were privately urging Dawn to run. I know that from the excitement we saw from a few thousand people who were willing to give money and volunteer time to Dawn’s candidacy. But more than anything else, I know that from the meetings we had with the party machine operators in Delaware County who were genuinely scared that Dawn was going to shake up the status quo and tried hard to talk her out of running.
Dawn decided early on that if she ran it would be as an independent. Through our meetings, she got to see behind the scenes of party politics and it was too ugly. There is nothing ugly about Dawn. In all of the meetings we had, no one talked about the problems of the district or the nation; it was all about money and control.
Maybe Dawn was naïve, maybe we both were, but we got to see the men behind the curtain; the men with their hands on the levers and buttons of the political machines. The candidate’s positions on the issues are just part of a strategy to win, not based on a core belief. The only core belief is winning.
Dawn did not want to be controlled by anyone. She didn’t want to owe any party. Those running for Congress will promise that they are “their own person” and “independent” and the vast majority then vote the way the party tells them to vote. That’s how the parties retain power and how the Representatives stay in office.
Dawn wanted no part of that. She wanted only to owe the people she would represent.
So she has quietly been talking with independent political advisors, putting together a campaign team and an impressive coalition of volunteers to get signatures.
And then life got in the way. My job in New York is going very well, and although I love the Philadelphia area and especially Delaware County, where I was born and raised, we could not imagine a life that revolved around an Amtrak marriage, where we got on separate trains in the morning and headed in opposite directions.
We would never each other. Even worse, we would never see our kids.
And so we have told our realtor (a free plug for Danny Logan, my nephew) to stop looking in Delaware County and start looking in Bucks County.
I know Dawn still believes in public service and wants to get involved in the local schools and community, wherever we end up. She wants to fight for a wonderful quality of life for our family and for our new neighbors.
And who knows, maybe one day, Dawn will be a member of Congress. But I can guarantee that it won’t be until our sons, Michael and David, are much older.
As I mentioned, with Dawn it is all about her core beliefs. Family and children comes first. It’s not a potential campaign slogan; she lives it.
I am so sorry, Delaware County. You needed the charisma, passion and excitement Dawn would have brought to the race to break the machine hold on Delaware County. Your loss is Buck’s County’s gain, my children’s gain and mine.





















May 20th, 2010 at 12:24 pm
If she was going to run as an Independent – she is her own person not controlled by either Party. I don’t question her beliefs or values. I question this article and the “She’s too good to run” reason for not running.
The ‘marriage comes first” reasoning I can accept but the rest is nonsense. The reason one runs as an Independent is to fight the reasons you tell us why she won’t run.
I wish the Mendte family well. Maybe this kind of self-serving stuff helps the relationship between two people. I hope it does. But it doesn’t help my view of things.
May 20th, 2010 at 3:20 pm
May 20th, 2010 at 3:57 pm
Wishing you & your family all the best…..
May 20th, 2010 at 6:23 pm
I never said she is too good to run – why did you put that in quotes.
It does appear that I hit a nerve though – the question is why?
GMcl – We were both just stunned that issues never came up in any meeting – as if they were irrelevant. That was what shocked us. Maybe we are naive – but I expected better.
May 21st, 2010 at 11:31 am
It hit a nerve because the article makes little sense to me. Unless neither of you remembered where Delaware County is in relationship to NYC –I just don’t get why we had to read about “machines” and Dawn’s values and belief system.
Anyway – I fully agree with the final decision and her priorities.
Again – I wish your family the best.
May 21st, 2010 at 1:02 pm
May 21st, 2010 at 8:51 pm
May 21st, 2010 at 10:10 pm
Jim – Yes they did happen and “Party Machin Operators” was the perfect term for the people we met with. We do agree about Dawn – and the rhetoric was not nonsense.
May 21st, 2010 at 11:30 pm
May 22nd, 2010 at 11:33 am
Your career jumped the shark a few years ago, please don’t take Dawn down with you.
May 22nd, 2010 at 2:54 pm
May 23rd, 2010 at 7:26 am
Second, he said he would have voted for an supports the Civil Rights Act. His problem is an unbending Libertarian ideology that Government should have little control over what we do inside our homes, our stores or companies.
He handled the Rachel Maddow question poorly because he is not a politician. But he “clarified” his position the next day and said he agrees with the need for the Civil Rights Act and believes it rectfiies a long history of problems.
May 23rd, 2010 at 10:39 am
May 23rd, 2010 at 10:59 am
Let’s deal with your absurd points one at a time.
First, lets look at the underlying sexism in this sentence – “So, Larry, your prosecution by Pat Meehan played absolutely no role in your decision to have your wife consider running for Congress against Meehan.”
I didn’t have my wife do anything. That is so blatantly sexist and exposes a problem with the Good Ol’ Boy politics in the county. No, if Dawn wanted to hurt Pat Meehan she could have spoken out against him in several newsaper and magazine articles. Or she could have put here name on the ballot to make certain he lost. If Dawn wanted to hurt Pat Meehan – she could. But that was never her goal – she wanted to win and represent the 7th district in Congress.
Second – We had long planned on moving to Delaware County before our son Michael started first grade, which would be this September. So we would have lived there. Dawn and I were married in Delaware County, my family is still there and we visit all of the time, our children were baptized there and Dawn speaks there to groups constantly.
Third – Did I smear anyone? I did what a journalist does – I reported without giving up the sources. I promised that I would not divulge names and that specifics were off the record. I was within my bounds to generalize based on several meetings. I stand by what I said – the goal is winning, power and money – not issues. I am certain that is not specific to Delaware County – it was just eye opening to us.
And finally – I will come out on my own soon enough to write and talk more about Pat Meehan. That I can promise you. But as for Dawn, it was not about him but about her longing for public service. If she was a typical politician, she would have run. But she is not, other things are much more important to her.
I am proud of her. And if you knew her, you would know that your conspiracy theory is ridiculous.
May 24th, 2010 at 10:03 am
Your comments are not “reporting without giving up sources”. A “smear” in my book is an unsubstantiated accusation. What you have alleged here would not have been printed or reported by any editor, even in your Inside Edition days. Stand like a man and name names, places, dates and times.
And what could your wife possibly “spoken out” against Pat Meehan about – other than she may have been displeased that you were convicted of a crime (and, Larry, isn’t it time that you faced the fact that it is because of YOU that YOU were in trouble – not because of Pat Meehan). Is your wife going to disagree with him on the issues? Since Dawn has never articulated any issues she believes in nor made any public statements, it would be difficult to know.
May 24th, 2010 at 11:14 am
Rand Paul the “citizen” was being unclear and dishonest when he said didn’t agree with portion of the Civil Rights Act that dealt with private businesses.
And after the ensuing bad press, Rand Paul the “politician” was being totally honest when he renounced that and said he would support the Civil Rights Act.
You really believe this?
September 24th, 2010 at 3:39 am