A little over a week ago, First District Councilman Frank DiCicco introduced Bill 110386 in an attempt to amend the 1999 Sidewalk Behavior law to, in his words, “give police … more authority … as to people who are aggressively panhandling …” by ordering those officers to arrest homeless persons without even attempting to first get the assistance of social service professionals who are trained to deal with the kind of financial, mental health, and/or substance abuse problems that many of those human beings have. The current law, which requires such mental health involvement, ain’t broken and therefore doesn’t need to be fixed. In fact, it has become a national model as noted by Sister Mary Scullion, co-founder of Project H.O.M.E., an advocacy group for the homeless.
There are already laws on the books addressing harassment, terroristic threats and simple assault to deal with real criminal behavior if that’s what DiCicco is truly worried about. But that’s not really what he’s worried about. What he’s really stressed about is what he actually said, which is that “hotel guests … are uncomfortable” with having to deal with those kind of people. Well, whooptie-goddamn-do! Tell those upper-crust fancy pants that we’re blue-collar folks here in Philly, and we’re tough enough to deal with the trauma of encountering—GASP!—a talkative guy wearing ragged jeans who hasn’t showered in a few days.
The people arrested under DiCicco’s proposed ordinance could become ineligible for public housing and medical benefits—thereby criminalizing poverty. It also would strain the city’s already tight budget: Securely incarcerating someone costs up to three times more than simply housing a person.
Homelessness is not just a Philadelphia thing. It’s a national thing, actually a national disgrace in light of the abundant wealth that this country displays when it really wants to. A whopping 3.5 million persons experience homelessness in a given year—and about 40 percent of them are children! And families with children are the fastest growing segment of the homeless population. It’s not a predominantly minority thing either. Most homeless persons in America are white.
Recent Housing and Urban Development studies indicate that 31 of 50 states plus the District of Columbia had increases in homelessness. And by the way, homelessness is not personified by the stereotypical drunken deadbeat ex-con. In fact, about 44 percent of homeless people have jobs. The main cause, as pointed out by the U.S. Conference of Mayors, is a lack of affordable housing as a result of unemployment, under-employment, lay-offs, salary decreases and benefits give-backs. Only after these primary economic causes does mental illness make the list.
Those same studies also reported that nearly 650,000 persons experience homelessness on any given night. And of that number, close to a quarter million are people in families. And, embarrassingly, more than 130,000 reportedly are veterans—the most patriotic of all Americans. Something’s very wrong with all of this. And local or state bills like DiCicco’s are making things go from bad to worse.
We need solutions, not more problems. The problems of homelessness have existed on this land even before it was called the United States of America. As documented by Jeff Olivet, a nationally recognized expert and the director of training at the Center for Social Innovation, the “first cases of homelessness date back to the 1640s, mainly in the Northeast in the bigger cities of the original 13 colonies … (including) Philadelphia.” He also points out that as a result of the Industrial Revolution, primarily in the 1820s and 1830s, people began moving from farms to cities, which resulted in massive overcrowding and widespread under-housing, as well as worker exploitation and a poor urban underclass. It was during this period that “there were reports from Philadelphia … of masses of people wandering the streets. This is the first time we saw anti-panhandling ordinances. The city jails became the de facto shelter system.” Man, I knew he was a career politician, but I didn’t know that DiCicco has been in office that long.
The Great Depression of 1929 and its aftereffects through the early 1940s exacerbated the problems already faced by the poor, catapulting even more into homelessness. Economic stagnation and inflation since then, and certainly now, are the reasons that things remain difficult for most and dire for many, particularly the 528 homeless folks—or should we say, future jailed convicts—living on Center City streets today.
Philadelphia is our home. And home is supposed to be where the heart—not the heartlessness—is.
For more information, go to One Step Away, which is described as “Philadelphia’s first newspaper produced by those without homes for those with homes.”



















May 23rd, 2011 at 4:49 pm
May 23rd, 2011 at 5:40 pm
I liked the way you mentioned the national and historic character of homelessness– reminding me that the great Philadelphian, Benjamin Franklin, was himself homeless for a while in his youth.
The “talkative guy wearing ragged jeans who hasn’t showered in a few days” may not be the next Benjamin Franklin– but he is a human being, and a superior one if he isn’t hurting himself or others.
May 23rd, 2011 at 7:16 pm
For argument’s sake here we’ll have to accept it as a matter of principle that most vacationers choose to allocate discretionary spending in places where they are not hassled by the homeless (Surprising, I know!) If your cheif remedy for homelessness is job availability/growth, it follows then that it would be in the interest of your argument to increase the number of people who would want to visit Philadelphia – anything detrimental to that cause would exacerbate the existing problem. More visitors equals more jobs as more waiters, bellhops, drivers, cleaning perssonel, construction and various trade workers, managers of all of the above are needed to provide infrastructe and services to the growing number of tourists; and of course vice-versa.
Unfortunately it’s not the “fancypants” in your mature and not-at-all-caricaturesque manner of description, who have the most vested interest in the absence/presence of panhandlers, but rather business owners and managers responsible for deciding whether or not to make capital investments in this region – eg. the folks who decide whether to create new jobs in Philadelphia or in other cities that might show more promise as tourist destinations down the road.
May 24th, 2011 at 3:10 pm
May 25th, 2011 at 3:02 pm
Well done in your choice to spend your free time in support of the homeless. Can’t read whether your parting words are a geniune request (ie. “What do you do to help society, Mr. Smith?”) – in which case I’m happy to elaborate offline – or sarcasm (ie. you choose to spend your ‘teering time with the homeless. Fine, I spend an evening a week in corporal works of mercy for two other very worthy causes. We chose different paths.)
The article, in fact, misses a greater point: I have lived in Center City for 5 years and have observed the homeless become increasingly aggressive and threatening in the past 18 months. Whether it is panhandlers on 17th and Walnut, packs of travelling homeless young adults making threats in the park or let’s not even get into the folks influencing commercial behavior in parts of Center City East/Chinatown. Perhaps this is trite compared with the violent crime witnessed downtown in the 90s or the weird Chestnut Street arcade scene in the 80s, but the increased aggressiveness creates a uncomfortable, even fearful aura around areas of the city that should be the most welcoming.
For someone like Mr. Coard who lives in North Philadelphia and has made it his life’s work to represent and live among far more dangerous individuals, a guy cursing menacingly because you didn’t give him a dollar is a minor event, if even that. For a mother from Charlotte showing her three small children the Liberty Bell, it probably marks the last time she picks Philadelphia as a vacation destination. That’s unacceptable. I have no issue with a homeless man holding a cup and ironic sign on Suburban Station bench. I do have a problem with vagrants lining up outside of Center City ATMs and following convenience store patrons for a half a block. Bad for business all around.
Homelessness is a terrible problem and there is no easy solution. But it only takes a handful of aggressive panhandlers to give the city a reputation. Philadelphia should not lose important tourism income, jobs and tax revenue to other cities because of it.
May 27th, 2011 at 10:05 am
May 29th, 2011 at 2:06 am
While Councilor DeCicco’s bill seems to be rather harsh in light of the circumstances of the homeless, your response, though well written and without being laced with profanity for once, offers no real solution.
I don’t know where your office is, but if it’s a high rise in a respectable area with a number of other tenants who cater to the alleged “upper crusties” of the world, put yourself in the place of hotel management who spend $ millions on wages, advertising, upkeep, room service, waitstaff, etc., etc. in order to attract clientele to help the hotels pay the egregious taxes they have to pay on top of everything else, which is passed on to the consumer in the end.
Does not the ultimate consumer, who is paying through the nose, have some right to enter and exit the hotel without having to run through a gauntlet of raggedly-dressed, unwashed souls who, upon seeing people with some means, feel as though they must force them to pay some sort of toll simply to go about their business?
My point is, Michael, what is your solution to the homeless problem? Do you go out there in the morning to round them all up, or perhaps just a dozen, and get them a warm meal and perhaps a shower and a change of clothes to make them feel better about themselves?
You can choose a different dozen every day to make sure that no one is deprived of warmth and respect.
You can head up a lawyers group to have them all contribute in some measure to help eradicate the problem and the plight of the homeless. Or you can simply write and whine about it…
These people are beaten, Michael. They have given up hope of ever having some sort of normal life where they can share time with their kids and their husbands or wives in a secure setting, perhaps waiting for and watching the Flyers on cable TV exact revenge on the Bruins next year for the sweep out of the playoffs this year.
Sadly, you are correct that a great number of the homeless are veterans. And yet even more sadly, you offer no real solution other than dismissing the councilor’s attempt to ensure that the hotels and their clients can go about their business unimpeded.
The next step is on you, Mike.
And remember what this coming Monday is all about. It’s about the comrades of the now-homeless who died in battle, leaving the now-homeless veterans forever spiritually injured in having seen their friends killed in action, and never having received the type of counseling necessary to try to make them whole again that the current Commander-in-Chief once stated that they should be willing to pay for themselves.
There’s an old Greek saying that the “fish rots from the head,” meaning the problem is more than just Philadelphia. It’s a national disgrace.