A CNN/Opinion Research Corporation national poll released on Monday found that Rick Perry now leads the pack among GOP presidential hopefuls, with more than one in four Republican voters saying they would cast a ballot for the longtime Texas governor. I’m not sure what scares me more, the idea of a Perry presidency or the fact that one of my neighbors might be among those who would support it.
Rick Perry is not your average Republican, a fact that—taken at face value—may seem like a refreshing change to a GOP voting base fed up with politics as usual. But underneath the elephant suit, Perry is a far-right demagogue who supports repealing the Sixteenth and Seventeenth amendments (which authorize the collection of income taxes and the popular election of senators, respectively) and scrapping our 235-year tradition of checks and balances by giving the legislature the ability to overturn Supreme Court decisions.
Anyway you slice it the Texas governor is a fringe candidate; that he represents an extremely vocal minority can’t be denied (radicalism by its very nature is vocal), but Perry’s beliefs are obscenely out of step with the majority of voters from both parties, which makes his current popularity that much more confounding. The paradox would be intriguing if it weren’t so scary.
Beyond his dangerous fiscal policies—like a promise to cut spending while increasing the military budget, or his support for a balanced-budget amendment during a period of economic recovery—Perry’s social agenda runs so counter to American sentiment that he makes the Tea Party look like a Rainbow Gathering.
He presides over a state that executes more people than any other in a nation where support for the death penalty is waning. He has called for a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, while across the country support for the institution has grown faster over the past two years than at any other time in history. (Polls show that more than half of Americans now favor it.)
Even on the heated subject of abortion—which Perry supports banning—a Gallup poll from May finds more people are now pro-choice than pro-life (49 percent to 45 percent, respectively) and far more people in both parties (71 percent, according to the Pew Research Center) support some form of compromise over outright abolition.
Don’t get me wrong: I feel for Rick Perry and his supporters. It must be hard to live in a country that is so out of step with your beliefs. I can’t blame them for trying to change it. But I carry a special disdain for the majority of Republicans—especially those in Pennsylvania, who tend to be fiscally conservative and socially moderate—who don’t share Perry’s radical views but would cast their vote for him anyway. It’s these voters, who would put the country at risk as part of a reactionary exercise against an admittedly unpopular president, who are lifting Perry in the polls.
To the “Big Tent” Republicans who rallied under Ronald Reagan to expand party membership in the 1980s through enlightened conservative outreach, Perry represents the antithesis of their goals: a partisan exclusivist who is so far to the right on social issues that we can only hope that thinking conservatives will soon put down the Kool-Aid and open their eyes to what a post-Perry America would really look like.
Until that time comes it falls to the rest of the thinking population to spread the word about Perry’s peculiar (and dangerous) brand of conservatism. I’ll start.
Here are four things that will suffer under a Perry presidency:
The Environment: Perry has famously bashed the Environmental Protection Agency for years. The candidate’s spokesman, Mark Miner, laid out Perry’s plans for the agency recently in an article in the Texas Tribune: “The governor’s energy priorities will be centered around scaling back the EPA’s intrusive, misguided and job-killing policies, which will empower states to foster their own energy resources without crippling mandates and open the doors for our nation to pursue and strengthen an all of the above energy approach,” he said.
An “all of the above” energy approach is code for scrapping any regulation that currently gets in the way of probing, drilling or scraping the earth in search of whatever remnants of fossil fuel we haven’t already tapped.
A vocal skeptic of climate change, Perry sued the EPA last year, challenging its classification of greenhouse gases as pollutants. Of the BP Oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, Perry famously remarked: “From time to time there are going to be things that occur that are acts of God that cannot be prevented.”
His support for the oil business in his state helped him draw in more than $11 million in donations since 1998. One of the governor’s primary donors is a man named Harold Simmons, a Dallas billionaire who managed to squeak out permits for a West Texas radioactive waste disposal site over objections from environmental officials in 2008. Bloomberg reported on Wednesday that Simmons has donated more than $1.2 million to Perry’s campaigns during his governorship.
Perry’s outlook is inspired by a version of Christianity called Dominionism that believes God has given the human race, specifically Christians, carte blanche to use the Earth to their advantage and that “Christians have a God-given right to rule all earthly institutions.” In his book, Fed Up! Our Fight to Save America from Washington, Perry writes: “We are Americans, of course we can have the world we want to live in.”
Your Faith: Rick Perry thinks you’re going to hell. Well, maybe not you, but those of us who haven’t accepted Jesus Christ as our Lord and Savior (which includes Catholics, Jews, Muslims, Hindus and Buddhists). How do I know that you ask? Because he said as much. Asked by the Dallas Morning News in 2007 to respond to a pastor’s assertion that nonbelievers get a “non-stop ticket” to fire and brimstone, Perry said: “In my faith, that’s what it says, and I’m a believer of that.”
It’s also a primary caveat of the fiery brand of evangelism he practices, which holds that only Christ, not the law, the government or the collective efforts of passionate and determined individuals, can save the world from utter destruction. Perry has made little effort to hide his religious convictions, some of which are frankly troubling, particularly his proximity to pastors affiliated with the New Apostolic Reformation, which believes, among other things, that tragedies like 9/11 are punishment from God. The group played a prominent role in the “Response”—the August 6th prayer meeting in Texas at which Pastor John Hagee, who infamously called the Catholic Church “The Great Whore,” offered a prayer for the Governor.
Perry gave his own sermon at the meeting, begging God for forgiveness for the sins of America, which he believes have caused everything from Hurricane Katrina to the economic collapse. “And as a nation, we have forgotten who made us, who protects us, who blesses us, and for that we cry out for your forgiveness,” Perry prayed.
Your Children: From his open denial of human-caused climate change to his famously telling a child in New Hampshire that evolution is “a theory that is out there—and it’s got some gaps in it,” Rick Perry has become a laughingstock in the scientific community.
He’s also made it clear that he supports prayer in school and would fight to re-institute it. And he mistakenly (but no doubt, longingly) stated that Texas public schools are currently teaching creationism alongside evolution—even though the Supreme Court has ruled it unconstitutional. That last statement, also made in New Hampshire, may have been a Freudian slip, but throughout his tenure Perry has worked to appoint pro-creationist officials to the Texas Board of Education, which last year approved new standards that, among other things, require instructors to teach the Christian influences on the founding of America and mandates that students evaluate efforts by global organizations such as the United Nations to undermine U.S. sovereignty.
The governor has also pushed an abstinence-only sex education policy that has been a miserable failure (Texas has among the highest teen pregnancy rates in the country.)
But none of that compares to what Perry did to Texas schools this year, whacking $4 billion from the school budget in a determined effort to balance the budget through spending cuts. Ezra Klein, writing for the Washington Post, called the cuts “the first per-capita decrease in education spending since World War II” and said they could put tens of thousands of teaching jobs in the state at risk.
The Union: Though he has since rejected the notion, on at least one occasion Perry has suggested that Texas could become so fed up with the federal government that it might choose to secede. In 2009, Perry told a reporter:
“There’s a lot of different scenarios. We’ve got a great union. There’s absolutely no reason to dissolve it. But if Washington continues to thumb their nose at the American people, you know, who knows what might come out of that. But Texas is a very unique place, and we’re a pretty independent lot to boot.”
Was he being serious, or just making empty threats? I’m not sure it matters.
Writer and photographer Christopher Moraff is a news features correspondent for the Philadelphia Tribune and a contributing writer for the Chicago-based magazines Design Bureau and In These Times, where he serves on the board of editors.





















September 1st, 2011 at 9:17 am
September 1st, 2011 at 11:00 am
September 1st, 2011 at 11:14 am
September 1st, 2011 at 12:05 pm
September 1st, 2011 at 12:09 pm
will start wars, and will damage education and science nationally. In other words the perfect Republican candidate. Please run Rick. OBama had more brains in 3rd grade than you do now. And your GOP buddies who cut taxes in the Bush years and just trashed our credit rating by not working out a bi partisan tax reform deal,,,,reap it you creeps..Will
September 1st, 2011 at 1:31 pm
September 1st, 2011 at 5:15 pm
September 2nd, 2011 at 2:15 am
September 2nd, 2011 at 10:07 am
Jerimy wright=obama
were sorry=obama
and the 1000 statement< jobs or lack there of=obama
reminds me of a famouse line "i've Got a Plan for that hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
VOTE PERRY and if you cant vote Perry remember we still gotta survive NO MORE OBAMA he is his worst enemy bet hes on tv again today and to say what its the other guys fault
September 2nd, 2011 at 10:13 am
Hasnt Obama done enough to er for you already
The writer of this article is just following orders from the whitehouse dont blame him personally
September 2nd, 2011 at 10:15 am
September 2nd, 2011 at 11:29 am
Perry’s energetic support of capital punishment and his blind refusal to consider any mitigating evidence in the cases of death row inmates, no matter how scientific, shows what a danger he would be if placed in charge of the federal government’s huge law enforcement system.
President Perry would have control of the Justice Department, which can reach into almost every aspect of our lives. He would appoint justices to the Supreme Court and other federal courts. In addition, the federal government has great influence over state courts and law enforcement, both indirectly and through grants and frequent state-federal cooperation in criminal investigations. Federal power reaches down to the cop on the beat. ***
“Almost all recent executions have been in one region of the country—the south—and most of those in one state—Texas,” the Death Penalty Information Center reported in its 2009 report “Smart on Crime: Reconsidering the Death Penalty in a Time of Economic Crisis.”
The center polled 500 randomly selected police chiefs around the country and found few who believed the death penalty was a deterrent to crime. Instead, they cited a shortage of resources and the effects of drugs and alcohol as factors that made law enforcement harder. Insufficient use of the death penalty was at the bottom of the list.
Another telling argument against the death penalty is scientific: the number of inmates—alleged murderers and others—who have been exonerated through DNA testing. A 2010 report by the Innocence Project, famed for freeing the falsely accused, said 250 convicts have been exonerated through DNA testing and they “are the tip of the iceberg.”
Perry has been unmoved by the importance of scientific evidence. ***
The case that sheds the most light on Perry’s attitude is that of Cameron Todd Willingham, executed in 2004 after being convicted of setting a house fire that killed his three small daughters. As reported in extensive detail by the Chicago Tribune in 2004 and The New Yorker in 2009, arson experts from around the country, plus the newspaper’s reporting, found that the investigation was badly flawed. Well-respected arson experts said the fire might well have been an accident. The conclusion was backed up by a report from four fire scientists for the Innocence Project. Perry, The Texas Tribune said, dismissed such findings and called Willingham a guilty “monster.”
A state agency, the Texas Forensic Science Commission, began an investigation of the scientific criticisms. Shortly before a scientist—one of the critics—was about to testify, Perry told three commission members they would not be reappointed and he replaced the chairman with one of his allies, a hard-line pro-death-penalty district attorney. The commission moved away from an investigation of the Willingham case. This was in 2009, a year before Perry’s re-election campaign when the Willingham case was becoming the subject of greater scrutiny in criminal justice circles in Texas and around the country.
This is just one case, but a revealing one, involving all aspects of the Texas criminal justice system over which Rick Perry presided. Whether Texas had executed an innocent man seemed to mean little to him. No part of government is more important to individual rights than the criminal justice system and its components, courts and cops. Giving Perry control of them would be a real threat to democracy.
September 2nd, 2011 at 9:51 pm
the Justice dept has been caught sending guns to cartels in mexico and thats ok well maybe neither is ok but you jump on Perry for the execution well tell me where the difference is explain this murder of people with fast and furios (not a great speller)…
The liberals twist everything but maybe people wouldnt loose their life for murder as often if they knew the consequences.
By the way Im more Independent than Conservative and Anyone can see what we have is not working thats for sure the people are suffering and just as Obama hasnt been able to institute some of his waky Ideaologies Our next President will Not cut peoples social security change the national scale for death penalty which by the way automatically get appeals all the way up so If they are executed then they probably have been thru enough it would be stopped now does that sound like 1 person lets be frank tell the facts on both sides compare YOU DECIDE if the chickens have come home to roost:)
People Obama is in over his head hmm went back to the plant where he boasted THIS IS THE FUTURE that plant is now closed
Obama has kept wall street happy catering to them now look it up
Please Compare and be fair Popular or not a man stands by whats happening not boo hoo its GWB not me GOD ENOUGH ALREADY EXCEPT YOUR FAILURES 1 JOB DURING THE STIMULAS COST OVER 1 MILLION 4 HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS HECK WE COULD HAVE HIRED 50 PEOPLE FOR 4 YRS FOR THAT KIND OF MONEY NOW iM GONNA ASK YOU TO LOOK IT UP HOW MANY JOBS ARE DOCUMENTED THAT WERE SAVED OR CREATED 9 PERCENT UNEMPOLYMENT LOOK AT THE PAST 4 PRESIDENTS i THINK IT WAS 6 PERCENT WHEN OBAMA BECAME PRESIDEN GAS WAS ABOUT 2.50 HELP ME SHOW YOU
September 4th, 2011 at 2:30 pm
VER BAD FOR A PRESIDENT WE HAD ENOUGH OF TEXAS AND MIGRANT WORKERS
September 5th, 2011 at 10:13 pm
September 8th, 2011 at 4:56 pm
“Christianity neither is, nor ever was a part of the common law.”
-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Dr. Thomas Cooper, February 10, 1814
“I have found Christian dogma unintelligible. Early in life I absented myself from Christian assemblies.”
-Benjamin Franklin, in Toward The Mystery